Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intervention was timely with discovery only partially completed and an acceptable justification for delay provided
• \Proffering this alleged violation of the consent decree as an affirmative defense is directly counter to the City's interest.\
• noting that intervenors and defendant shared ultimate objective of defending hiring practices
• \Proffering this alleged violation of the consent decree as an affirmative defense is directly counter to the City's interest.\
• \Proffering this alleged violation of the consent decree as an affirmative defense is directly counter to the City's interest.\
• finding a substantial interest when the litigation would interpret a consent decree to which the proposed intervenors were parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).