Timothy J. Jordan v. Anthony J. Principi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the CUE procedure \is broad enough to allow an appellant to rephrase and provide additional argument and support for the same basic CUE argument presented before the Board.\
• holding that the CUE procedure “is broad enough to allow an appellant to rephrase and provide additional argument and support for the same basic CUE argument presented before the Board.”
• holding that on appeal to the Board an appellant is not bound to the exact words used in a request for revision on the basis of CUE in a Board decision and may “rephrase and provide additional argument and support for the same basic CUE argument presented”
• holding that on appeal to the Board an appellant is not bound to the exact words used in a request for revision on the basis of CUE in a Board decision and may “rephrase and provide additional argument and support for the same basic CUE argument presented”
• holding that on appeal to the Board an appellant is not bound to the exact words used in a request for revision on the basis of CUE in a Board decision and may \rephrase and provide additional argument and support for the same basic CUE argument presented\
• holding that on appeal to the Board an appellant is not bound to the exact words used in a request for revision on the basis of CUE in a Board decision and may \rephrase and provide additional argument and support for the same basic CUE argument presented\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).