· 6/5/2001
Timothy J. Grendell Gerald W. Phillips, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. The Ohio Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
Citations
- 252 F.3d 828
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11593
- 2001 WL 603949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]here the threat of repeated injury is speculative or tenuous, there is no standing to seek injunctive relief.”
- “[F]ears of prosecution cannot be merely ‘imaginative or speculative.’” (quoting Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 42 (1971))
- “When seeking declaratory . . . relief, a plaintiff must show actual present harm or a significant possibility of future harm.”
- “[F]ear of prosecution cannot be ‘imaginary or speculative.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole, Gilman, Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.