Skip to main content
· 6/5/2001

Timothy J. Grendell Gerald W. Phillips, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. The Ohio Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

Citations

  • 252 F.3d 828
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11593
  • 2001 WL 603949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here the threat of repeated injury is speculative or tenuous, there is no standing to seek injunctive relief.”
  • “[F]ears of prosecution cannot be merely ‘imaginative or speculative.’” (quoting Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 42 (1971))
  • “When seeking declaratory . . . relief, a plaintiff must show actual present harm or a significant possibility of future harm.”
  • “[F]ear of prosecution cannot be ‘imaginary or speculative.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Gilman, Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.