Timothy Hatten v. Joe White, Employee, Usp Leavenworth Justin C. Harsha, Employee, Usp Leavenworth A. Fekekte, Employee, Usp Leavenworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 2680(c) applies when prisoner alleges officers detained property and mailed it outside prison
• providing that, because an inmate was “allowed to send the property he could not possess in prison to a place of his choosing,” he was not unlawfully “deprived of the property”
• finding there is a difference between owning property and possessing property in prison and where the prisoner “was allowed to send the property he could not possess in prison to a place of his choosing,” there was no deprivation of property
• “A Bivens action may not be brought against federal agencies or agents acting in their official capacities.”
• “A Bivens action may not be brought against federal . . . agents acting in their official capacities.”
• “there is a difference between the right to own property and the right to possess property while in prison”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).