Timothy Harney v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in evaluating probable cause for a false-arrest claim, “the court’s inquiry is limited to what the officer knew at the time of the arrest and not what has been gained from hindsight”
• noting the inquiry into probable cause “is limited to what the officer knew at the time of the arrest”
• affirming the district court’s award of costs for binding deposition transcripts, transferring VHS tapes to DVDs and duplication, and copies of cell phone records when the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that those costs were unreasonable
• warrantless entry upheld, consent found where officer followed one of two arrestees into condominium unit and neither arrestee objected to officer’s presence in their home
• implied consent found where party was told he was under arrest prior to entering home
• implied consent found where, prior to entering the residence, officers told an individual he was under arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).