Skip to main content
· 5/21/1999

Timothy H. Ex Rel. Kratisha H. v. Cedar Rapids Community School District

Citations

  • 178 F.3d 968
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9767
  • 1999 WL 342817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statutory obligation to provide FAPE did not require school district to reimburse parent for intra-district transportation outside of neighborhood school boundary where neighborhood school provided FAPE
  • finding no discrimination where there was “no evidence that the [defendant’s policy] was formulated or implemented with disabilities in mind.”
  • “To prevail on a Rehabilitation Act claim under this section, a plaintiff must establish that she (1) is a qualified individual with a disability; (2) was denied the benefits of a program or activity of a public entity receiving federal funds; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Hansen, Kopf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.