Skip to main content
· 7/11/2025

Timothy Bryan Standfield v. State of Alabama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error in instructing the jury that it could return nonunanimous guilty verdicts did not require reversal of convictions rendered by unanimous guilty verdicts
  • holding that a trial court’s error in instructing the jury that it can return nonunanimous verdicts is harmless with respect to verdicts that are nonetheless unanimous
  • holding that error in instruct- ing the jury that it could return nonunanimous guilty ver- dicts did not require reversal of convictions rendered by unanimous guilty verdicts
  • holding that error in instructing the jury that it could return nonunanimous guilty verdicts did not require reversal of convictions rendered by unanimous guilty ver- dicts
  • concluding that trial court’s instructional error on nonunanimous verdicts is harmless when the verdict is unanimous
  • holding that a nonunanimous jury instruction is not a structural error that requires retrial when the jury convicts the defendant unanimously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.