Timothy Allen Jayne v. The People of the State of Colorado.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “under current case law, asking [the] defendant to participate in the physical FSTs after he invoked his Miranda rights constituted impermissible interrogation that violated his rights under Article I, section 12”
• asking the defendant, who was in custody and had invoked Miranda rights, to perform the physical FSTs constituted impermis- sible interrogation in violation of Article I, section 12
• “[W]e conclude that the rule we have discerned—that asking for consent to search * * * constitutes impermissi- ble interrogation unless the law precludes the use of a person’s refusal against the person at trial—is the one demanded by the dictates of current precedent.”
• “[W]e conclude that the rule we have discerned—that asking for consent to search * * * constitutes impermissi- ble interrogation unless the law precludes the use of a person’s refusal against the person at trial—is the one demanded by the dictates of current precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).