Timothy A. Cloyd v. Arthur Andersen & Company, Inc., and Roxanne Laine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the grant of additional time to serve remains discretionary with the district court and that “[r]elief may be justified, for example, if the applicable statute of limitations would bar the refiled action . . . .”
• under prior version of rule, 4(j), holding that “the fact that the statute of limitations has run, however, does not demonstrate good cause and does not make dismissal under Rule 4(j) inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).