Timms v. Greene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although one of the parties was domiciled in Delaware, the contract itself did not involve interstate commerce
• affirming trial court’s finding that section 15-48-10(a) had not been satisfied because the contract did not contain on its first page any mention of arbitration
• Declaring that “the State Act is clear with regard to the notice requirement,” the decision affirmed circuit court’s finding that section 15-48-10 had not been satisfied, because the contract did not contain on its first page any mention of arbitration
• analyzing agreement and employee’s duties under contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).