Timmons v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Harris rule applies to both statements and tangible physical evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tyree
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-01-08· cited 126×
• State v. Straub
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-30· cited 49×
• Creekmore v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-18· cited 22×
• State v. Davis
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-15· cited 9×
• Dalton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-16· cited 9×
• Sapen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-20· cited 8×
• Volz v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-26· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Street
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-10-25· cited 7×
• Snider v. Pekny
  N.D. Indiana· 2012-09-27· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• New York v. Harris
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 658×
• Foster v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-05-09· cited 24×
• Timmons v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-02-07· cited 11×