Skip to main content
· 9/24/1985

Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 713 P.2d 589
  • 1985 OK 76
  • 1985 Okla. LEXIS 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • there was no valid satisfaction in the face of a controversy over the amount of interest that was due
  • there was no valid satisfaction in the face of a controversy over the amount of interest that was due
  • post-mandate nisi prius execution-related contest after an earlier affirmance
  • post-mandate nisi prius execution-related contest after an earlier affir-mance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Opala, Hodges, Lavender, Hargrave, Wilson, Summers, Simms, Doolin, Kauger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.