Skip to main content
· 12/24/1991

Timmons v. City of Tucson

Citations

  • 830 P.2d 871
  • 171 Ariz. 350
  • 102 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 35
  • 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 344
  • 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Both [Title VII and the Arizona Civil Rights Act] provide for the recovery of back pay, a remedy that has been held to be equitable in nature.” (citing Albemarle Paper Co.)
  • “Both [Title VII and the Arizona Civil Rights Act] provide for the recovery of back pay, a remedy that has been held to be equitable in nature.” (citing Albemarle Paper Co.)
  • trial court instructs jury on legal theories supported by evidence
  • ACRA authorizes front pay in appropriate circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Hathaway, Livermore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.