· 12/24/1991
Timmons v. City of Tucson
Citations
- 830 P.2d 871
- 171 Ariz. 350
- 102 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 35
- 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 344
- 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Both [Title VII and the Arizona Civil Rights Act] provide for the recovery of back pay, a remedy that has been held to be equitable in nature.” (citing Albemarle Paper Co.)
- “Both [Title VII and the Arizona Civil Rights Act] provide for the recovery of back pay, a remedy that has been held to be equitable in nature.” (citing Albemarle Paper Co.)
- trial court instructs jury on legal theories supported by evidence
- ACRA authorizes front pay in appropriate circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Hathaway, Livermore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.