Skip to main content
· 11/6/2000

Timmons v. Cassell (In Re Cassell)

Citations

  • 254 B.R. 687
  • 2000 FED App. 0011P
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1261
  • 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 269
  • 2000 WL 1651390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Rule 9011 also imposes a continuing responsibility to review and reevaluate pleadings and modify them when it is appropriate”
  • “Proofs of claim must meet the standards of [Rule 9011]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgenstern-Clarren, Rhodes, Stosberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.