Timmins v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming LUBA’s decision that the peti- tioner was precluded from “raising certain issues [that] could have been but were not raised in the earlier appeals”
• affirming LUBA’s decision that the peti- tioner was precluded from “raising certain issues [that] could have been but were not raised in the earlier appeals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).