Timkin-Detroit Axle Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mere presence of an inaccuracy in an internal credit file, if it is not disclosed to a third party, causes no concrete harm”
• holding that an “injury in law is not an injury in fact” for purposes of Article III standing
• holding that “[e]very class member must have Article III standing in order to recover individual damages”
• holding that a party must have standing “for each claim that [it] press[es] and for each form of relief that [it] seek[s]”
• concluding that certain plaintiffs lacked standing to sue for damages because they “did not demonstrate that the risk of future harm materialized”
• holding that informational injury requires “downstream consequences” from failing to receive information (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).