Skip to main content
· 12/19/1994

Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. DOES NOS. 1-2

Citations

  • 876 F. Supp. 407
  • 34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1395
  • 1994 WL 760997
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiffs’ application insufficient where murky photocopies of copyrighted designs and trademarks provided insufficient guidance to marshal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.