Time Warner Cable v. Freedom Electronics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that cable piracy may result in FCC-prohibited “signal leakage” and creates an unfair subsidy to “freeloaders”
• “Several federal courts have held that absence' of justification for violation of clear statutory rights virtually eliminates the necessity of showing irreparable harm.”
• “[T]he plaintiff suffers irreparable harm from each converter-decoder device which one of plaintiffs subscribers purchases from defendants.”
• “[Sjeveral federal courts have held that absence of justification for violation of clear statutory rights virtually eliminates the necessity of showing irreparable harm”
• “[T]he plaintiff suffers irreparable harm from each converter-decoder device which one of plaintiffs subscribers purchases from defendants”
• finding such an injunction will promote the public interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).