Skip to main content
· 10/31/2007

Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. USA Video Technology Corp.

Citations

  • 520 F. Supp. 2d 579
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80582
  • 2007 WL 3196301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen 26 investigating a first-filed issue, relation back analysis is unnecessary[] because the ‘point 27 1 of the inquiry is the original complaint, not the amended complaint.’ ” (quoting Schering 2 Corp. v. Amgen Inc., 969 F. Supp. 258, 267 (D. Del. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary Pat Thynge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.