Time, Inc. v. Ultem Publications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it rests with imitator to disprove natural inference that he intended to create confusion, even in absence of further proofs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Yoshida International, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1975-03-20· cited 111×
• Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1963-01-23· cited 47×
• Time, Inc. v. Life Television Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 1954-07-28· cited 21×
• Avon Periodicals, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.
  New York Supreme Court· 1952-04-29· cited 15×
• Continental Connector Corp. v. Continental Specialties Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 1979-11-21· cited 10×
• Sub-Contractors Register, Inc. v. McGovern's Contractors & Builders Manual, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1946-08-02· cited 8×
• S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Johnson
  W.D. New York· 1939-08-01· cited 4×
• Atlantic Monthly Co. v. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
  S.D. New York· 1960-07-15· cited 4×
• Chicago Reader, Incorporated v. Metro College Publishing Company
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-07-14· cited 3×
• TIME, INCORPORATED v. Motor Publications
  D. Maryland· 1955-05-11· cited 3×
• Time, Incorporated v. Motor Publications, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1955-12-15· cited 2×
• Nos. 13702-13705
  Third Circuit· 1963-01-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Yale Electric Corporation v. Robertson
  Second Circuit· 1928-06-11· cited 283×
• L. E. Waterman Co. v. Gordon
  Second Circuit· 1934-07-16· cited 101×
• Three in One Oil Co. v. St. Louis Rubber Cement Co.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1937-01-25· cited 6×