Tim Riley v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a vocational expert’s testimony that was “based on hypothetical questions that did not encompass all relevant impairments, does not constitute substantial evidence to support the AL]’s decision’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).