Tim L. Godby v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the defendant’s motion to correct erroneous sentence was not the proper method to challenge a sentencing aggravator
• explaining that the defendant’s motion to correct erroneous sentence was not the proper method to challenge a sentencing aggravator
• no error in denying motion to correct erroneous sentence; appellant presented sentencing claim that would have required an examination of the sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).