Tilo Co. v. Fishman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• maintaining that although the plaintiff received notice of the decision late, the delay did not cause the plaintiff to lose his right to appeal because the appeal period began when the plaintiff actually received notice
• plaintiff not entitled to new trial on ground that it had lost right of appeal from judgment due to delay in issuance of notice of decision and judgment as plaintiff had twenty days after issuance of delayed notice within which to file appeal but failed to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).