· 12/31/1914
Tillotson v. Paquet
Citations
- 74 Or. 539
- 145 P. 268
- 1914 Ore. LEXIS 428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that dismissal based on forum non conveniens is a final appealable order if the other prerequisites for finality are met
- finding that a document labeled “Final Judgment” was not “a final judgment as to all of the claims and counterclaims in the case”
- noting that where Rule 58 requirement was not waived, district court did not lose jurisdiction to enter separate judgment
- finding that the act of state doctrine properly applied to bar the defendants’ affirmative defense challenging the lawfulness of the Venezuelan government agency’s intervention of the Venezuelan company-plantififf
- discussing the impact of the Second Hickenlooper Amendment on Sabbatino
- “Under Florida law, a conversion is ‘an unauthorized act which deprives another of his property permanently or for an indefinite time.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean, Eakin, McBride, McNary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.