Skip to main content
· 12/31/1914

Tillotson v. Paquet

Citations

  • 74 Or. 539
  • 145 P. 268
  • 1914 Ore. LEXIS 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that dismissal based on forum non conveniens is a final appealable order if the other prerequisites for finality are met
  • finding that a document labeled “Final Judgment” was not “a final judgment as to all of the claims and counterclaims in the case”
  • noting that where Rule 58 requirement was not waived, district court did not lose jurisdiction to enter separate judgment
  • finding that the act of state doctrine properly applied to bar the defendants’ affirmative defense challenging the lawfulness of the Venezuelan government agency’s intervention of the Venezuelan company-plantififf
  • discussing the impact of the Second Hickenlooper Amendment on Sabbatino
  • “Under Florida law, a conversion is ‘an unauthorized act which deprives another of his property permanently or for an indefinite time.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bean, Eakin, McBride, McNary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.