Supreme Court of Georgia· 2/21/1991
Tillman v. State
Citations
- 400 S.E.2d 632
- 260 Ga. 801
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- OCGA § 16-13-30 (d) is not irrational because sentence for second offense of possession of cocaine is greater than that for trafficking in cocaine, OCGA § 16-13-31 (a) (f)
- OCGA § 16-13-30 (d) is not irrational because sentence for second offense of possession of cocaine is greater than that for trafficking in cocaine, OCGA § 16-13-31 (a) (f)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-06-03· cited 40×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-04-21· cited 23×
- Isom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-09-26· cited 23×
- Hancock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-10-13· cited 15×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-10-29· cited 13×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 12×
- Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-11-27· cited 11×
- Hailey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-06-07· cited 11×
- Cantrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-06-05· cited 6×
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-01-15· cited 4×
- Rucks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-06· cited 4×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.