Tillison v. City of San Diego

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disapproving district court analysis that “foeus[ed] on the actual effect of the statute” and noting that “[t]he focus of the safety exception to preemption must be on the legislative intent and whether the legislature was acting out of safety concerns”
• “Recent developments, including the Supreme Court’s providing a broader interpretation of the safety exception to the FAAAA and the California legislature’s amending section 22658, persuade us to reconsider Tocher.”
• “For the foregoing reasons, including material statutory authority not available at the time of the district court decision, we conclude that the statute is not preempted; it is safety-related and comes within the safety exception to federal preemption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).