Tillis Trucking Co., Inc. v. Moses

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a computer-generated animation of an accident used as a demonstrative aid did not conflict with the testimony at trial
• distinguishing that case from Madden on the grounds that the record in Tillis Trucking both contained “countervailing evidence” and lacked the “considerable evidence” supporting a present-value determination that was available to the trial court in Madden
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying an \eleventh hour\ motion for a continuance alleging a scheduling conflict where, at the time the motion was filed, a jury had been selected
• \`This Court will not hold a trial court to be in error unless that court has been apprised of its alleged error and has been given the opportunity to act thereon.'\ (quoting Sea Calm Shipping Co., S.A. v. Cooks , 565 So.2d 212 , 216 (Ala. 1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).