Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that unless a statute is ambiguous, “the application of standard rules of statutory interpretation is unwarranted”
• finding there is no need to employ the rules of statutory construction when the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous
• approving timing of notice to persons eligible to join the class
• approving timing of notice to persons eligible to join the class
• plaintiffs’ claims accrued prior to filing of class action lawsuit; therefore, version of consumer protection statute in effect when plaintiffs filed the lawsuit and court granted summary judgment was controlling
• “The Consumer Protection Code and the Dealers Act share a common purpose: protection of the consumer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).