Tilden v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Without an adequate explanation by the Board as to its reasoning, we conclude that a meaningful review * * * is impossible.”
• although reviewing “court does not substitute its judgment as to what inferences should be drawn from the evidence,” agency must articulate “a rational relationship between its findings and its conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).