· 3/7/2006
Tilbury Constructors, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Citations
- 40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 392
- 137 Cal. App. 4th 466
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2026
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 2795
- 71 Cal. Comp. Cases 393
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “there are at least two separate requirements to establish breach of the implied covenant: (1) benefits due under the policy must have been withheld; and (2) the reason for withholding benefits must have been unreasonable or without proper cause”
- declining to extend tort cause of action based on insurer’s handling of subrogation with regard to third-party claim because “most of the factors Jonathan Neil relies upon persuade us that [plaintiff] has not stated a claim.”
- “here, most of the factors Jonathan Neil relies upon persuade us that Tillbury has not stated a claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.