Skip to main content
· 3/7/2006

Tilbury Constructors, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Citations

  • 40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 392
  • 137 Cal. App. 4th 466
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2026
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 2795
  • 71 Cal. Comp. Cases 393
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “there are at least two separate requirements to establish breach of the implied covenant: (1) benefits due under the policy must have been withheld; and (2) the reason for withholding benefits must have been unreasonable or without proper cause”
  • declining to extend tort cause of action based on insurer’s handling of subrogation with regard to third-party claim because “most of the factors Jonathan Neil relies upon persuade us that [plaintiff] has not stated a claim.”
  • “here, most of the factors Jonathan Neil relies upon persuade us that Tillbury has not stated a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.