Tikalsky v. Circuit Court for Waukesha Cnty.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the detained person is the “real party in interest” in a habeas petition filed by a next friend
• noting that a person \held as a material witness\ is \entitled to the constitutional protections extended to other citizens\
• noting that a person “held as a material witness” is “entitled to the constitutional protections extended to other citizens”
• finding inaccessibility when petitioner was unable to file a petition on his own behalf because he was being held “incommunicado” as an enemy combatant
• “No 19 accepted canon of statutory interpretation permits ‘placement’ to 20 trump text, especially where, as here, the text is clear and our 21 reading of it is fully supported by the legislative history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).