Tighe v. Roecker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to apply the special relationship exception to impose upon the state an affirmative duty \to protect the mentally retarded living at home\
• refusing to apply the special relationship exception to impose upon the state an affirmative duty \to protect the mentally retarded living at home\
• city and state did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment in reducing or eliminating services to mentally retarded persons living at home
• even if attending “state-sponsored day programs” amounted to “intermittent custody,” that would not create a duty to protect
• even if attending “state-sponsored day programs” amounted to “intermittent custody,” that would not create a duty to protect
• \Full compliance with an injunction amounting to the entirety of the relief sought renders an issue moot.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).