Skip to main content
· 7/7/1994

Tighe v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Citations

  • 877 P.2d 1032
  • 110 Nev. 632
  • 1994 Nev. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding exception to going and coming rule for on-call employees, particularly police officers who are uniquely on call at all times
  • “[T]he unique nature of law enforcement requires us to distinguish it from other types of traditional employment.”
  • “[T]he unique nature of law enforcement requires us to distinguish it from other types of traditional employment.”
  • answering scope of employment question in worker's corfipensation - setting
  • distinct benefit to employer exception and police officer exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.