Tighe v. City and County of Honolulu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a provision of the Honolulu city charter, analogous to the Colorado open records laws, inapplicable as a limitation on Hawaii Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b)(1)
• holding disclosure of records to a party during the course of litigation does not constitute the type of “public inspection” precluded by the public records act
• “The very broad discovery specifically granted to litigants under the provisons of Rules 33(b) and 26(b)(1
• open records provision of Honolulu City Charter does not limit rules of civil procedure
• open records provision of Honolulu City Charter does not limit rules of civil procedure
• \The very broad discovery specifically granted to litigants ... cannot be said to be limited by the terms of a charter provision directed toward regulation of the entirely different situation of the general exploration of public records by any citizen during general business hours.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).