Tiger v. Workman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that absent constitutional mandate requiring particular jury instruction, “a habeas petitioner must show that, in the context of the entire trial, the ei’ror in the instruction was so fundamentally unfair as to deny the petitioner due process”
• “In his application for a COA, Tiger lists all ten of the issues presented to the federal district court as ‘issues to be raised on appeal.’ However, he presents argument only on the two jury instruction issues. Thus, the other issues are waived.”
• “In his application for a COA, Tiger lists all ten of the issues presented to the federal district court as ‘[i]ssues to be raised on appeal.’ However, he presents argument only on the two jury instruction issues. Thus, the other issues are waived.”
• “In his application for a COA, Tiger lists all ten of the issues presented to the federal district court as ‘issues to be raised on appeal.’ However, he presents argument only on the two jury instruction issues. Thus, the other issues are waived.” (alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).