Skip to main content
· 3/24/2006

Tiffee v. Patel

Citations

  • 925 So. 2d 1232
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 1068
  • 2006 WL 1128206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to require additional objection after instructions given would be “an unnecessary elevation of form over substance”
  • given Rule 46 of Fed.R.Civ.P., not necessary to object to instruction if position previously clearly made to court
  • applying District of Columbia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.