Tiffany v. the Christman Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• future income computation based on testimony that average annual wage increase in field was 6% held permissible
• future income computation based on testimony that average annual wage increase in field was 6% held permissible
• “Any prediction regarding future losses is inherently speculative. Underlying such a prediction are assumptions regarding wage trends and work life expectancy that are not susceptible to precise estimation.”
• where court held it was permissible for expert witness in a personal injury action involving future loss of wages to base his opinion on wage trends, work life expectancy, and other similar data not of record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).