Skip to main content
· 9/11/1975

Tiffany Construction Co. v. Hancock & Kelley Construction Co.

Citations

  • 539 P.2d 978
  • 24 Ariz. App. 504
  • 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • chips for road surfacing, although required to be individually manufactured for each order, were not uniquely manufactured to meet specifications and were generally available in market
  • although cost of chips considerable in relation to contract price, real consideration in prime contract was application of chips to road, i.e., chip supplier did not subcontract for part of performance of essential part of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Haire, Eu-Bank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.