· 7/1/1965
Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Tile Corporation
Citations
- 345 F.2d 214
- 52 C.C.P.A. 1396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- opposer introduced forty-seven registrations of “TIFFANY” or Tiffany & Co. for a wide variety of household items to oppose registration of “TIFFANY” for ceramic tile
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Worley, Rich, Smith, Almond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.