Tiffany & Co. v. National Gypsum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal habeas courts lack jurisdiction “to 4 review state court applications of state procedural rules”
• concluding appellants “failed to carry th[eir] burden” to show appellate jurisdiction under § 1292(a)(1), particularly when its application would “expand[] the jurisdiction of appellate courts over interlocutory orders in numerous . . . cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).