TIEU v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the evidence established that both the “defendants and their predecessor, James, had an ‘honest belief’ that the disputed strip was part of lot 3200”
• relying in part on existence of a fence to conclude that the claimants’ mistaken belief of ownership was reasonable
• in the context of an adverse possession claim, explaining that “[p]roperty owners do not suddenly lose their property merely by remaining silent when another person disputes their ownership or makes a claim to the same land”
• in the context of an adverse possession claim, explaining that “[p]roperty owners do not suddenly lose their property merely by remaining silent when another person disputes their ownership or makes a claim to the same land”
• relying on two to four years of James’s possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).