Tietsworth v. Sears

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a motion to dismiss UCL unlawful prong claims to the extent the plaintiffs had stated violations of the CLRA and the Song-Beverly Act
• purchaser continued to use washing machine to clean clothes for full duration of implied warranty period despite occasional error messages, but machine did not fail until after warranty period
• “It is axiomatic that the complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition 16 to a motion to dismiss.”
• under Rule 23(d), a court “has authority to strike 17 class allegations prior to discovery if the complaint demonstrates that a class action cannot be 18 maintained”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).