Tietjen v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attorney is entitled to be present and “[a]ny unnecessary interference caused by an attorney could be alleviated by specific court order.”
• however, Washington's counterpart to Fed.R.Evid. 35 permits an attorney to be present during a physical examination
• “A [defense] CR 35 medical and mental examination is a legal proceeding [where the] 19 No. 36994-3-III Zink v. City of Mesa physician-patient relationship establishing privilege does not exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).