Tiefenbrun v. Tiefenbrun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting South Carolina courts have determined joint custody \is usually considered harmful to and not conducive to the best interest and welfare of a child\
• noting South Carolina courts have determined joint custody \is usually considered harmful to and not conducive to the best interest and welfare of a child\
• finding divided custody is not in best interest of the child when there is an \acrimonious relationship between Husband and Wife\
• noting parties' uncooperative behavior that prolongs litigation can justify holding each responsible for his or her attorney's fees
• finding any error in the family court's determination concerning the counselor's knowledge of the husband's behavior was harmless because the finding was not \any more damaging to [the h]usband than the other evidence presented\
• \[T]he welfare and best interests of the child are the primary considerations in determining visitation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).