Tiedeman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming probation condition that restricted defendant from appearing drunk in public when alcohol was an important contributing factor to his criminal behavior
• affirming probation condition that restricted defendant from appearing drunk in public when alcohol was an important contributing factor to his criminal behavior
• upholding condition of probation that defendant not appear drunk in public for five years
• because a different statute (AS 12.55.085(a)) governs probation when a defendant receives a suspended imposition of sentence (SIS
• condition of misdemeanor probation prohibiting Tiedeman from appearing intoxicated in public for five years upheld, because of the link between intoxication and his past criminal behavior
• because a different statute (AS 12.55.085(a)) governs probation when a defendant receives a suspended imposition of sentence (SIS

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).