Tiedeman & Sons v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding fees to the prevailing parties in a case in which the state legislature failed to draw congressional districts, over the Board of Elections's objection that it had ''no interest in the eventual outcome except that there be an outcome'' for it to implement
• awarding fees to the prevailing parties in a case in which the state legislature failed to draw congressional districts, over the Board of Elections’s objection that it had “no interest in the eventual outcome except that there be an outcome” for it to implement
• awarding fees to the prevailing parties in a case in which the state legislature failed to draw congressional districts, over the Board of Elections's objection that it had \no interest in the eventual outcome except that there be an outcome\ for it to implement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).