Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/9/1991
TIE Communications, Inc. v. Kopp
Citations
- 218 Conn. 281
- 589 A.2d 329
- 1991 Conn. LEXIS 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that parol evidence is admissible for the purpose of explaining an ambiguity in a written instrument
- explaining that, although use of parol evidence is disallowed if offered solely to vary or contradict written terms of integrated contract, parol evidence is permitted ‘‘(1) to explain an ambiguity appearing in the instrument; (2
- “The parol evidence rule pertains to contract terms, not assertions of fact.”
- discussion of exceptions to parole evidence rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-01-17· cited 319×
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-15· cited 222×
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-21· cited 144×
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-08-27· cited 123×
- Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-08-18· cited 86×
- Lester v. Resort Camplands International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-17· cited 76×
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-06· cited 72×
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-01· cited 69×
- Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-09· cited 54×
- Sims v. Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-04-20· cited 53×
- Scinto v. SosinConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-12-15· cited 48×
- Vezina v. Nautilus Pools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-06-16· cited 44×
- Murtha v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 34×
- Gebbie v. Cadle Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-06-30· cited 32×
- Clean Corp. v. FostonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-12-14· cited 30×
- Shawmut Bank Connecticut v. Connecticut Limousine Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-02-06· cited 30×
- Cohn v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceD. Connecticut· 1999-08-27· cited 22×
- Capp Industries, Inc. v. SchoenbergConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-02· cited 20×
- Giorgio v. Nukem, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-05-04· cited 19×
- Tarpon Bay Partners LLC v. Zerez Holdings CorporationSecond Circuit· 2023-08-11· cited 14×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-08-30· cited 120×
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 75×
- Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-05-05· cited 70×
- Tyers v. ComaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-02-20· cited 67×
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. B. W. Beardsley, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-06-21· cited 47×
- Dale v. GearSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1871-02-15· cited 38×
- Raymond v. SellickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1835-06-15· cited 36×
- Taft Realty Corp. v. Yorkhaven Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-04-15· cited 32×
- Roe v. JeromeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1846-07-15· cited 24×
- Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-26· cited 22×
- Pinsky v. DuncanSecond Circuit· 1990-04-25· cited 19×
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 19×
- Caplan v. SaltzmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-04-17· cited 15×
- Denison Development Co. v. GuntherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-22· cited 14×
- Security Equities v. GiambaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-14· cited 12×
- Vanoski v. ThomsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-16· cited 6×
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.