Skip to main content

TIE Communications, Inc. v. Kopp

Citations

  • 218 Conn. 281
  • 589 A.2d 329
  • 1991 Conn. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that parol evidence is admissible for the purpose of explaining an ambiguity in a written instrument
  • explaining that, although use of parol evidence is disallowed if offered solely to vary or contradict written terms of integrated contract, parol evidence is permitted ‘‘(1) to explain an ambiguity appearing in the instrument; (2
  • “The parol evidence rule pertains to contract terms, not assertions of fact.”
  • discussion of exceptions to parole evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.