Tidwell v. City of Memphis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “On the Job Injury Appeals Panel” for the City of Memphis is subject to the contested case procedures set forth in the UAPA
• holding that the “On the Job Injury Appeals Panel” for the City of Memphis is subject to the contested case 6 procedures set forth in the UAPA
• concluding that “under section 27-9-114,” proceedings before a city’s on-the-job inquiry panel, “as well as the standard of judicial review of its decisions, are governed by the UAPA.”
• concluding that “under section 27- 9-114,” proceedings before a city‟s on-the-job inquiry panel, “as well as the standard of judicial review of its decisions, are governed by the UAPA.”
• noting that a 1989 amendment to this chapter supplanted the more limited scope of the common law writ of certiorari with the broader standards of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA)
• as an alternative to workers’ compensation, a city implemented an OJI program to “establish its own administrative procedure to handle benefit applications for work-related injuries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).