Tidwell v. Bassett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court committed no error in denying motion for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict “[b]ecause the evidence presented a disputed question of material fact with respect to the intent of the parties” and thus over whether a mutual mistake had occurred
• concluding that trial court committed no error in denying motion for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict “[b]ecause the evidence presented a disputed question of material fact with respect to the intent of the parties” and thus over whether a mutual mistake had occurred
• deed may be reformed “where by mistake of the scrivener and by oversight of the parties, the writing does not embody or fully express the real contract of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).