Tidman, Mark v. Frontier Logistical Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that four years of inaction by state court of appeals excused exhaustion requirement for a habeas petitioner
• holding that four years of inaction by state court of appeals excused exhaustion requirement for a habeas petitioner
• holding that four years of inaction by state court of appeals excused exhaustion requirement for a habeas petitioner
• stating that the court has “been careful to underscore that the label ‘without prejudice’ does not always prevent a disposition from being a de facto final judgment”
• finding ineffective process based on the “systemic deficiency” in the state’s management of its appeals process
• finding excusal from compliance with exhaustion requirement allowed the plaintiff “to bring the claims alleged in his state motion for postconviction relief directly to federal court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).